From “Spooky Action” to Scalable Resource: A State-of-the-Field Thematic Review of Quantum Entanglement Science, 2015–2025

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65166/se20ge78

Keywords:

quantum entanglement, Bell nonlocality, no-signalling principle, quantum communication,  quantum metrology, quantum networks

Abstract

Quantum entanglement has developed from a foundational challenge to quantum mechanics into a central resource in emerging quantum technologies. This structured thematic review synthesizes developments in entanglement science across five domains: conceptual foundations, experimental tests of Bell nonlocality, quantum communication and cryptography, quantum sensing and metrology, and unresolved theoretical and engineering problems. The review emphasizes peer-reviewed literature published from 2015 to 2025 while incorporating essential historical studies that established the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen problem, Bell’s theorem, and the experimental development of Bell tests. The synthesis shows that loophole-free Bell experiments provide strong empirical evidence against local-realist explanations of quantum correlations, while the no-signalling principle continues to preclude the use of entanglement for faster-than-light communication. Entanglement has also been demonstrated across increasingly diverse physical systems, including photons, trapped ions, solid-state qubits, neutral atoms, quantum memories, and high-energy particle systems. Its technological maturity, however, varies substantially across applications. Quantum-enhanced sensing and metrology have achieved significant experimental progress, whereas large-scale quantum networks and fault-tolerant quantum computing remain constrained by photon loss, decoherence, imperfect quantum memories, finite-resource entanglement distillation, and multipartite complexity. The review concludes that entanglement science is foundationally mature but technologically uneven and frontier-active. It recommends greater methodological integration across physical platforms, sustained research on quantum repeaters and multipartite systems, and more precise public communication distinguishing nonlocal correlation from superluminal information transfer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Pironio, S., & Scarani, V. (2007). Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Physical Review Letters, 98(23), 230501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501

Aolita, L., de Melo, F., & Davidovich, L. (2015). Open-system dynamics of entanglement: A key issues review. Reports on Progress in Physics, 78(4), 042001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/4/042001

Avis, G., Ferreira da Silva, F., Coopmans, T., Dahlberg, A., Jirovská, H., Maier, D., Rabbie, J., Torres-Knoop, A., & Wehner, S. (2023). Requirements for a processing-node quantum repeater on a real-world fiber grid. npj Quantum Information, 9, Article 100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-023-00765-x

Azuma, K., Economou, S. E., Elkouss, D., Hilaire, P., Jiang, L., Lo, H.-K., & Tzitrin, I. (2023). Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet. Reviews of Modern Physics, 95(4), 045006. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045006

Barnum, H., Beigi, S., Boixo, S., Elliott, M. B., & Wehner, S. (2010). Local quantum measurement and no-signaling imply quantum correlations. Physical Review Letters, 104(14), 140401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.140401

Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993). Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen channels. Physical Review Letters, 70(13), 1895–1899. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895

Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014). Bell nonlocality. Reviews of Modern Physics, 86(2), 419–478. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419

CMS Collaboration. (2024). Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV. Reports on Progress in Physics, 87(11), 117801. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ad7e4d

Fang, K., Wang, X., Tomamichel, M., & Duan, R. (2019). Non-asymptotic entanglement distillation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 65(10), 6454–6465. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2019.2914688

Friis, N., Vitagliano, G., Malik, M., & Huber, M. (2019). Entanglement certification from theory to experiment. Nature Reviews Physics, 1(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-018-0003-5

Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004). Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit. Science, 306(5700), 1330–1336. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104149

Giustina, M., Versteegh, M. A. M., Wengerowsky, S., Handsteiner, J., Hochrainer, A., Phelan, K., Steinlechner, F., Kofler, J., Larsson, J.-Å., Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Pruneri, V., Mitchell, M. W., Beyer, J., Gerrits, T., Lita, A. E., Shalm, L. K., Nam, S. W., Scheidl, T., . . . Zeilinger, A. (2015). Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons. Physical Review Letters, 115(25), 250401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401

Grote, H., Danzmann, K., Dooley, K. L., Schnabel, R., Slutsky, J., & Vahlbruch, H. (2013). First long-term application of squeezed states of light in a gravitational-wave observatory. Physical Review Letters, 110(18), 181101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.181101

Hensen, B., Bernien, H., Dréau, A. E., Reiserer, A., Kalb, N., Blok, M. S., Ruitenberg, J., Vermeulen, R. F. L., Schouten, R. N., Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Pruneri, V., Mitchell, M. W., Markham, M., Twitchen, D. J., Elkouss, D., Wehner, S., Taminiau, T. H., & Hanson, R. (2015). Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature, 526(7575), 682–686. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15759

Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009). Quantum entanglement. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2), 865–942. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865

Huo, M.-R., Qin, J.-L., Cheng, J.-L., Yan, Z.-H., Qin, Z.-Z., Su, X.-L., Jia, X.-J., Xie, C.-D., & Peng, K.-C. (2018). Deterministic quantum teleportation through fiber channels. Science Advances, 4(10), eaas9401. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aas9401

Jia, W., Xu, V., Kuns, K., Nakano, M., Barsotti, L., Evans, M., Mavalvala, N., Abbott, R., Abouelfettouh, I., Adhikari, R. X., Ananyeva, A., Appert, S., Arai, K., Aritomi, N., Aston, S., Ball, M., Ballmer, S., Barker, D., Berger, B. K., . . . Zucker, M. E. (2024). Squeezing the quantum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limit. Science, 385(6715), 1318–1321. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado8069

Kimble, H. J. (2008). The quantum internet. Nature, 453(7198), 1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07127

Knaut, C. M., Suleymanzade, A., Wei, Y.-C., Assumpcao, D. R., Stas, P.-J., Huan, Y. Q., Machielse, B., Knall, E. N., Sutula, M., Baranes, G., Sinclair, N., De-Eknamkul, C., Levonian, D. S., Bhaskar, M. K., Park, H., Lončar, M., &

Lukin, M. D. (2024). Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network. Nature, 629(8012), 573–578. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07252-z

Lu, C.-Y., Cao, Y., Peng, C.-Z., & Pan, J.-W. (2022). Micius quantum experiments in space. Reviews of Modern Physics, 94(3), 035001. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.035001

Lu, H., Zhao, Q., Li, Z.-D., Yin, X.-F., Yuan, X., Hung, J.-C., Chen, L.-K., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Peng, C.-Z., Liang, Y.-C., Ma, X., Chen, Y.-A., & Pan, J.-W. (2018). Entanglement structure: Entanglement partitioning in multipartite systems and its experimental detection using optimizable witnesses. Physical Review X, 8(2), 021072. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021072

Maltoni, F., Severi, C., Tentori, S., & Vryonidou, E. (2024). Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair production at the LHC. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2024(3), Article 99. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2024)099

Manetsch, H. J., Nomura, G., Bataille, E., Lv, X., Leung, K. H., & Endres, M. (2025). A tweezer array with 6,100 highly coherent atomic qubits. Nature, 647, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09641-4

Masanes, L., Acín, A., & Gisin, N. (2006). General properties of nonsignaling theories. Physical Review A, 73(1), 012112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012112

Modi, K., Brodutch, A., Cable, H., Paterek, T., & Vedral, V. (2012). The classical–quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures. Reviews of Modern Physics, 84(4), 1655–1707. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1655

Norsen, T. (2011). John S. Bell’s concept of local causality. American Journal of Physics, 79(12), 1261–1275. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3630940

Peres, A., & Terno, D. R. (2004). Quantum information and relativity theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76(1), 93–123. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.93

Philip, A., & Wilde, M. M. (2025). Device-independent certification of multipartite distillable entanglement. Physical Review A, 111(1), 012436. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.111.012436

Pirandola, S., Eisert, J., Weedbrook, C., Furusawa, A., & Braunstein, S. L. (2015). Advances in quantum teleportation. Nature Photonics, 9(10), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.154

Plenio, M. B., & Virmani, S. (2007). An introduction to entanglement measures. Quantum Information and Computation, 7(1–2), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.26421/QIC7.1-2-1

Regula, B., Bu, K., Takagi, R., & Liu, Z.-W. (2020). Benchmarking one-shot distillation in general quantum resource theories. Physical Review A, 101(6), 062315. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.062315

Reiserer, A. (2022). Colloquium: Cavity-enhanced quantum network nodes. Reviews of Modern Physics, 94(4), 041003. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.041003

Ren, J.-G., Xu, P., Yong, H.-L., Zhang, L., Liao, S.-K., Yin, J., Liu, W.-Y., Cai, W.-Q., Yang, M., Li, L., Yang, K.-X., Han, X., Yao, Y.-Q., Li, J., Wu, H.-Y., Wan, S., Liu, L., Liu, D.-Q., Kuang, Y.-W., . . . Pan, J.-W. (2017). Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation. Nature, 549(7670), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23675

Schäfer, V. M. (2020). Fast gates and mixed-species entanglement with trapped ions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40285-3

Shalm, L. K., Meyer-Scott, E., Christensen, B. G., Bierhorst, P., Wayne, M. A., Stevens, M. J., Gerrits, T., Glancy, S., Hamel, D. R., Allman, M. S., Coakley, K. J., Dyer, S. D., Hodge, C., Lita, A. E., Verma, V. B., Lambrocco, C., Tortorici, E., Migdall, A. L., Zhang, Y., . . . Nam, S. W. (2015). Strong loophole-free test of local realism. Physical Review Letters, 115(25), 250402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402

Storz, S., Schär, J., Kulikov, A., Magnard, P., Kurpiers, P., Lütolf, J., Walter, T., Copetudo, A., Reuer, K., Akın, A., Besse, J.-C., Gabureac, M., Norris, G. J., Hamann, A. R., Ciurana, F. M., Martinez, J., Amaya, W., Mitchell, M. W., Abellán, C., . . . Wallraff, A. (2023). Loophole-free Bell inequality violation with superconducting circuits. Nature, 617(7960), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05885-0

Tóth, G. (2012). Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology. Physical Review A, 85(2), 022322. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022322

Votto, M., Zeiher, J., & Vermersch, B. (2024). Universal quantum processors in spin systems via robust local pulse sequences. Quantum, 8, 1513. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-10-29-1513

Wehner, S., Elkouss, D., & Hanson, R. (2018). Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead. Science, 362(6412), eaam9288. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9288

Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Moore, F. L., & Heinzen, D. J. (1992). Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy. Physical Review A, 46(11), R6797–R6800. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.46.R6797

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31